O
Troy
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Regulation

Troy

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (9)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 1, 2026.

Public comments (16)

ConcernedGreg LyonsOct 1, 2026

Praised certain guardrails in Local Law 3 but criticized the lack of independent citizen oversight to verify police compliance and ensure illegal searches are detected.

City Council - Oct 1, 2026 · 52:33 →
OpposedBrian Pos HernandezOct 1, 2026

Expressed deep concern over extending the data retention period from 48 to 72 hours and urged the council to cancel the Flock camera contract entirely.

City Council - Oct 1, 2026 · 56:12 →
OpposedFrancis SweetOct 1, 2026

Criticized loopholes added to Local Law 3, stating that the public overwhelmingly wants the cameras banned rather than regulated.

City Council - Oct 1, 2026 · 1:00:52 →
OpposedBeth RyanOct 1, 2026

Expressed disappointment that Troy utilizes Flock cameras, noting that many large cities operate successfully without them.

City Council - Oct 1, 2026 · 1:04:22 →
OpposedFrankieOct 1, 2026

Argued that Local Law 3 legalizes warrantless mass surveillance rather than stopping it, and cited national examples of camera misuse and error.

City Council - Oct 1, 2026 · 1:05:31 →
OpposedFrances SweetSep 17, 2026

Argued that the police failed to provide empirical evidence that ALPR cameras successfully solve crimes, and urged the council to get rid of the cameras entirely rather than regulating them.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:12:35 →
OpposedEmma DelapiaSep 17, 2026

Expressed concern over private entities holding surveillance data and longer retention periods, calling for the removal of Flock cameras from city streets.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 45:44 →
OpposedMayaSep 17, 2026

Raised concerns about facial recognition data collection and the lack of data privacy protections for Troy's youth and children.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 48:13 →
ConcernedBrie HarringtonSep 17, 2026

Thanked the council for removing misdemeanors from the law but criticized the increase in data retention to 72 hours and demanded the city cancel its contract with Flock.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 48:34 →
OpposedHeather CrimminsSep 17, 2026

Criticized the amended language in Local Law No. 3 as providing too many loopholes for police and described the debate as a distraction from the main goal of removing Flock cameras.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 52:40 →
OpposedFrankieSep 17, 2026

Argued that digital dragnetting without a judicial warrant is unconstitutional and urged the council to pause the legislation.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:42:39 →
OpposedRileySep 17, 2026

Shared personal discomfort at avoiding streets with Flock cameras and stated that surveillance turns Troy into a surveillance state.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 59:54 →
ConcernedEcho GoffSep 17, 2026

Requested that the 72-hour data retention be returned to 48 hours and highlighted potential worst-case scenarios involving government overreach and first amendment violations.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:01:42 →
OpposedDeirdre SheaSep 17, 2026

Criticized transparency reporting exemptions tied to existing case management systems, arguing they allow police to avoid upgrading systems to ensure proper oversight.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:05:21 →
OpposedJaySep 17, 2026

Expressed deep concern over facial and image database creation in the era of generative AI, emphasizing the right to bodily and digital privacy for children.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:07:20 →
OpposedCyanSep 17, 2026

Stated that the presence of Flock cameras makes them feel less safe rather than more secure in Troy.

City Council - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:08:29 →